Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Caldas, C H, Gibson, G E, Weerasooriya, R and Yohe, A M (2009) Identification of Effective Management Practices and Technologies for Lessons Learned Programs in the Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 531–9.

Chen, P, Partington, D and Qiang, M (2009) Cross-Cultural Understanding of Construction Project Managers’ Conceptions of Their Work. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 477–87.

Cheung, S O, Chow, P T and Yiu, T W (2009) Contingent Use of Negotiators’ Tactics in Construction Dispute Negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 466–76.

Hallowell, M and Toole, T M (2009) Contemporary Design-Bid-Build Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 540–9.

Ho, S P, Lin, Y, Chu, W and Wu, H (2009) Model for Organizational Governance Structure Choices in Construction Joint Ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 518–30.

Kale, S (2009) Fuzzy Intellectual Capital Index for Construction Firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 508–17.

Lo, W and Yan, M (2009) Evaluating Qualification-Based Selection System: A Simulation Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 458–65.

Lu, M, Lau, S and Poon, C (2009) Simulation Approach to Evaluating Cost Efficiency of Selective Demolition Practices: Case of Hong Kong’s Kai Tak Airport Demolition. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 448–57.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Waste management; Computer aided simulation; Simulation models; Demolition; Case reports; Hong Kong; Airports and airfields;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(448)
  • Abstract:
    This research resorted to the use of construction operations simulation modeling to investigate the cost efficiency of waste-handling practices on the Kai Tak Airport demolition project in Hong Kong. By modeling the site operation of sieving and stockpiling broken concrete, the well-established construction simulation methodology of CYCLONE was contrasted with the newly developed simplified discrete event simulation approach (SDESA). Further, the SDESA model was readily extended to include (1) raw demolition waste collecting and sorting; (2) broken concrete sieving and stockpiling; (3) steel bar recycling; and (4) debris disposal at the landfill. The production rate derived from simulation was indicative of a close match between the simulation model and the actual site system. The resulting simulation model provided a basis for evaluating the cost efficiency of actual site operations and alternative resource provision scenarios being postulated. Through computer simulation, the actual site operation was found smooth and efficient with utilization rates for resources of different types ranging from 79 to 99%. In addition, the cost–time reduction ratios were calculated for four alternatives of resource provisions in comparison with the original base case. The research findings suggested that provided the project budget had satisfied the higher cash flow requirement, doubling the resource provision on site would potentially cut the project duration by half and not increase the total direct cost.

Marti, P, Trümpi, S and Heinzmann, D (2009) Hydraulic Joint for Pipe Jacking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 439–47.

Molenaar, K R, Park, J and Washington, S (2009) Framework for Measuring Corporate Safety Culture and Its Impact on Construction Safety Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 488–96.

Wong, P S, Cheung, S O and Fan, K L (2009) Examining the Relationship between Organizational Learning Styles and Project Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 497–507.

Zhang, X (2009) Win–Win Concession Period Determination Methodology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(06), 550–8.